Current:Home > NewsEchoSense:Colorado Court Strikes Down Local Fracking Restrictions -WealthMindset
EchoSense:Colorado Court Strikes Down Local Fracking Restrictions
SignalHub View
Date:2025-04-10 07:16:54
The EchoSenseColorado Supreme Court struck down local fracking restrictions in two cities—Longmont, which had passed a ban, and Fort Collins, which had issued a five-year moratorium—issuing a one-two punch to the state’s anti-fracking movement.
Regulators at the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, not local communities, have the exclusive authority to regulate oil and gas activity in Colorado, the Supreme Court judges ruled Monday.
The Colorado decision echoes a similar ruling from the Ohio Supreme Court last year, which overturned a fracking ban in the town of Munroe Falls.
“This decision fits with the trend across most states, which is for state governments to preempt local control,” said Hannah Wiseman, an environmental law professor at Florida State University. “The exceptions have been New York and Pennsylvania, but most other states in which this issue has arisen have preempted local government, either through legislation or through courts interpreting existing legislation.”
The Colorado Oil and Gas Association (COGA), the state industry trade group that sued both cities, celebrated the news. “This decision sends a strong message to anyone trying to drive this vital industry out of the state that those efforts will not be tolerated,” COGA president Dan Haley said in a statement. “Bans and moratoriums on oil and gas are not a reasonable or responsible way to address local concerns.”
Environmentalists decried the decision and vowed to keep fighting for local control.
“The Colorado Supreme Court’s decision has not only tarnished the scales of justice, it places the citizens of communities at risk from a largely unregulated system of harmful pollution,” Shane Davis, a leading activist in the state, told InsideClimate News in an email.
“It’s beyond comprehension and it’s unconscionable,” Kaye Fissinger, a Longmont resident and activist, told InsideClimate News. “If anyone thinks we are going to lie down and play dead because of this ruling, they’ve got another thing coming.”
Colorado ranks sixth in the nation for natural gas production and seventh in crude oil, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. The state’s energy boom is largely due to the combination of fracking and horizontal drilling to extract previously hard-to-access fossil fuel resources.
With that boom, however, came concerns about how the expansion of oil and gas development would impact public health, the environment, noise pollution, road quality and property values. Longmont, about 15 miles northeast of Boulder, took the bold step of banning hydraulic fracturing and the storage and disposal of fracking-linked waste within its boundaries in 2012. It was quickly sued by the oil and gas industry. In 2013, Fort Collins passed a five-year fracking moratorium and was also served with a lawsuit by the industry.
A Colorado district judge ruled against both communities in 2014. After Longmont and Fort Collins appealed their previous decisions, the state appeals court successfully petitioned the high court to take on the controversial cases.
Fissinger and other activists are now looking to push for local control in a different way: the November ballot. A green group called Coloradans Resisting Extreme Energy Development has proposed two ballot initiatives on fracking. Their first proposal is to amend the state’s constitution to give local communities authority over fossil fuel activities, including the power “to prohibit, limit, or impose moratoriums on oil and gas development.”
Their second proposal seeks to expand the state’s setback rule. Currently, oil and gas operations in the state must be 500 feet away from homes and 1,000 feet away from any hospitals and schools. Activists propose a 2,500-foot separation from those buildings, as well as from bodies of water.
Similar ballot initiative efforts were blocked by a last-minute political deal struck between Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper and key donors of those campaigns in 2014. Environmentalists are hoping to avoid a repeat.
“If the system won’t protect us and the environment,” Davis said. “We will change the system.”
Correction: An earlier version of this story misidentified Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper as a Republican. He is a Democrat.
veryGood! (2)
Related
- New Mexico governor seeks funding to recycle fracking water, expand preschool, treat mental health
- Pence officially files paperwork to run for president, kicking off 2024 bid
- Woman dead, 6 others hurt in shooting at Chicago memorial
- Today’s Climate: May 11, 2010
- Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
- Today’s Climate: May 31, 2010
- When does life begin? As state laws define it, science, politics and religion clash
- Wisconsin Farmers Digest What the Green New Deal Means for Dairy
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- Today’s Climate: May 21, 2010
Ranking
- DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
- Life Kit: How to 'futureproof' your body and relieve pain
- New York counties gear up to fight a polio outbreak among the unvaccinated
- 988: An Alternative To 911 For Mental Health
- SFO's new sensory room helps neurodivergent travelers fight flying jitters
- Carbon Pricing Can Help Save Forests––and the Climate––Analysis Says
- ‘People Are Dying’: Puerto Rico Faces Daunting Humanitarian Crisis
- Kendall Jenner Only Used Drugstore Makeup for Her Glamorous Met Gala 2023 Look
Recommendation
Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
Global Coal Consumption Likely Has Peaked, Report Says
Today’s Climate: May 12, 2010
Utah district bans Bible in elementary and middle schools after complaint calls it sex-ridden
A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
Demand for Presidential Climate Debate Escalates after DNC Says No
Priyanka Chopra Shares How Nick Jonas “Sealed the Deal” by Writing a Song for Her
U.S. Unprepared to Face Costs of Climate Change, GAO Says