Current:Home > StocksSouth Dakota governor asks state Supreme Court about conflict of interest after lawmaker resigns -WealthMindset
South Dakota governor asks state Supreme Court about conflict of interest after lawmaker resigns
View
Date:2025-04-14 16:12:27
PIERRE, S.D. (AP) — South Dakota Republican Gov. Kristi Noem has requested guidance from the state’s Supreme Court about conflict-of-interest rules for lawmakers, several weeks after a South Dakota state lawmaker resigned and agreed to repay $500,000 in federal COVID-19 relief that she received for her day care business.
Jessica Castleberry was a state senator when she received the COVID-19 stimulus funding. Doing so violated a state Supreme Court advisory warning state lawmakers that it is unconstitutional for them to accept federal pandemic funding.
Noem, Attorney General Marty Jackley and two Republican lawmakers have sent letters to the court seeking clarity on what else is illegal, the Sioux Falls Argus Leader reported Thursday.
According to the state Constitution, lawmakers are banned from entering into state contracts “directly or indirectly” during their term and for a year after they finish serving in office.
In her letter, Noem raised specific questions about indirect contracts: Can lawmakers or their spouses be employed by school districts or counties? Can their businesses subcontract with the state for goods and services? And can they receive foster care reimbursements?
Majority Leader Sen. Lee Schoenbeck, a Republican of Watertown, said in his letter that “a literal reading of the ‘indirectly’ language ... would exclude a very large portion of South Dakota’s population,” according to the Argus Leader.
The letters also said lawmakers continuously vote on spending packages that fund schools and counties where the lawmakers or their spouses work.
Noem wrote that she is seeking guidance as soon as possible because she still needs to appoint someone to Castleberry’s open seat before the Legislature convenes in January.
Schoenbeck added that, depending on the court’s ruling, a number of lawmakers may need to resign or pay the state back for services received.
veryGood! (7)
Related
- San Francisco names street for Associated Press photographer who captured the iconic Iwo Jima photo
- See Kaia Gerber Join Mom Cindy Crawford for an Epic Reunion With ‘90s Supermodels and Their Kids
- Today’s Climate: June 1, 2010
- 66 clinics stopped providing abortions in the 100 days since Roe fell
- DoorDash steps up driver ID checks after traffic safety complaints
- Ethan Orton, teen who brutally killed parents in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, sentenced to life in prison
- U.S. Military Not Doing Enough to Prepare Bases for Climate Change, GAO Warns
- The Ice Bucket Challenge wasn't just for social media. It helped fund a new ALS drug
- The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
- Even in California, Oil Drilling Waste May Be Spurring Earthquakes
Ranking
- Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
- House GOP rules vote on gas stoves goes up in flames
- New Mexico’s Biggest Power Plant Sticks with Coal. Partly. For Now.
- Today’s Climate: July 1, 2010
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- IVF Has Come A Long Way, But Many Don't Have Access
- Kate Middleton's Look at King Charles III and Queen Camilla's Coronation Is Fit for a Princess
- Electric Car Bills in Congress Seen As Route to Oil Independence
Recommendation
Travis Hunter, the 2
Here's what the FDA says contributed to the baby formula shortage crisis
These $9 Kentucky Derby Glasses Sell Out Every Year, Get Yours Now While You Can
How Queen Elizabeth’s Corgis Are Still Living Like Royalty
Where will Elmo go? HBO moves away from 'Sesame Street'
Fracking the Everglades? Many Floridians Recoil as House Approves Bill
One of Kenya's luckier farmers tells why so many farmers there are out of luck
Today’s Climate: June 22, 2010