Current:Home > MyPasteurization working to kill bird flu in milk, early FDA results find -WealthMindset
Pasteurization working to kill bird flu in milk, early FDA results find
View
Date:2025-04-17 05:12:40
Preliminary results of tests run by the Food and Drug Administration show that pasteurization is working to kill off bird flu in milk, the agency said Friday.
"This additional testing did not detect any live, infectious virus. These results reaffirm our assessment that the commercial milk supply is safe," the FDA said in a statement.
The FDA's findings come after the agency disclosed that around 1 in 5 samples of retail milk it had surveyed from around the country had tested positive for highly pathogenic avian influenza, or HPAI H5N1. The U.S. Department of Agriculture this week also ordered testing requirements on cows in response to the outbreak, which has affected growing numbers of poultry and dairy cows.
Positive so-called PCR tests in milk can happen as the result of harmless fragments of the virus left over after pasteurization, officials and experts have said, prompting the additional experiments to verify whether or not the virus found in the milk was infectious. Those tests found it was not.
"The FDA is further assessing retail samples from its study of 297 samples of retail dairy products from 38 states. All samples with a PCR positive result are going through egg inoculation tests, a gold-standard for determining if infectious virus is present," the agency said.
While health authorities have said that milk from visibly sick cows is being discarded before entering the supply chain, officials have acknowledged the possibility that cows could be spreading the virus in their raw milk without symptoms or after they have otherwise appeared to recover.
The FDA said it had also tested several samples of retail powdered infant formula and toddler formula, which the agency said were all negative for the virus.
It is unclear what other foods the FDA has tested. An agency spokesperson did not answer questions about whether dairy products like cream, which can be pasteurized differently, have also been surveyed.
No beef cattle have been detected with the virus, the USDA has said, although it remains unclear whether the department has surveyed retail beef products for the virus.
So far, only one human infection has been reported this year, in a person who had contact with dairy cattle in Texas.
Though growing evidence is now confirming the safety of pasteurized milk, an additional challenge also remains for health authorities as they grapple with the possibility that dairy industry workers could be unknowingly exposed to the virus.
Unlike poultry, which quickly die off or are culled after H5N1 infections, cows largely go on to recover after a month or two.
Other animals have also not fared as well during the outbreak: the USDA said Friday that deaths and neurological disease had been "widely reported" in cats around dairy farms. Officials have said they suspect cats had been drinking leftover raw milk from infected cows.
"We know that the illness in cattle can go on for several weeks. So that puts workers at an ongoing risk. And thus, the period for monitoring will be longer," the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Sonja Olsen told reporters this week.
- In:
- Bird Flu
- Food and Drug Administration
- Avian Influenza
Alexander Tin is a digital reporter for CBS News based in the Washington, D.C. bureau. He covers the Biden administration's public health agencies, including the federal response to infectious disease outbreaks like COVID-19.
TwitterveryGood! (9269)
Related
- Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
- A lab chief’s sentencing for meningitis deaths is postponed, extending grief of victims’ families
- Tattoo regret? PetSmart might pay to cover it up with your pet's portrait. Here's how.
- Rihanna Transforms Into Blonde Bombshell With New Hair Look
- Pregnant Kylie Kelce Shares Hilarious Question Her Daughter Asked Jason Kelce Amid Rising Fame
- Tesla shares tumble below $150 per share, giving up all gains made over the past year
- Fire in truck carrying lithium ion batteries leads to 3-hour evacuation in Columbus, Ohio
- Missouri lawmakers expand private school scholarships backed by tax credits
- Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
- TikTok ban bill is getting fast-tracked in Congress. Here's what to know.
Ranking
- The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
- Caitlin Clark might soon join select group of WNBA players with signature shoes
- It's not just a patch: NBA selling out its LGBTQ referees with puzzling sponsorship deal
- Why Cheryl Burke Says Being a Breadwinner Put Strain on Matthew Lawrence Marriage
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- Alabama court authorizes executing a man convicted of killing a delivery driver
- Meghan Markle’s Suits Reunion With Abigail Spencer Will Please the Court
- Larsa Pippen and Marcus Jordan Rekindle Romance With Miami Beach Date
Recommendation
2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
Heat star Jimmy Butler has sprained ligament in knee, will be sidelined several weeks
Convenience store chain where Biden bought snacks while campaigning hit with discrimination lawsuit
High mercury levels in some Lake Maurepas fish bring meal restrictions, state officials say
How to watch new prequel series 'Dexter: Original Sin': Premiere date, cast, streaming
4 travel tips to put your mind at ease during your next trip
They got pregnant with 'Ozempic babies' and quit the drug cold turkey. Then came the side effects.
Caitlin Clark set to make $338K in WNBA. How much do No. 1 picks in other sports make?